Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch Sees ‘Clarity’ Coming in FanDuel Arbitration editorial policy.
  1. Dubai Tourism Chief Says City Won’t Become Gaming Destination, Despite MGM and Caesars Projects

Compare Accounts
×
Arkansas Supreme Court Rejects Pro-Casino Group Petition to Override AG on Ballot Proposal
Provider
Name
Description
Wynn Resorts Litigation Settlement Drags Scandal-Ridden Gaming Operator Down to Nine-Figure Q1 Loss  Churchill Downs to Resume Racing May 16, Pandemic Delays $300 Million Hotel Project  Land in Sight for Louisiana Riverboat Casinos as State Senate Passes ‘River to Shore’ Bill  Clark County Makes Coronavirus Tests Available at Orleans Casino  Poarch Band Indians Defend Lobbying in Alabama, Reject Anti-Lottery Claims  UPDATE: Man Holding Woman Hostage at Caesars Palace Arrested  MGM Springfield Opening Ahead of Schedule on August 24, but Wynn Boston Takeover Rumors Persist  Idaho Racetrack Group Accuses Coeur d’Alene Tribe of Intimidation, Bribery  Poarch Band Indians Defend Lobbying in Alabama, Reject Anti-Lottery Claims  Atlantic City Casinos Reopenings Advised by AtlantiCare Healthcare on Best Practices